Commentary for Bava Kamma 190:8
תנן גזל פרה ונתעברה אצלו וילדה רחל ונטענה אצלו וגזזה משלם כשעת הגזילה ילדה אין לא ילדה הדרא בעינא
— Said R. Zebid: They differ regarding the increased value [still] attaching to the misappropriated article. R. Judah maintained that this would belong to the plaintiff<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since the article has to be restored intact. ');"><sup>6</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 190:8. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.